↓ Skip to main content

Predicting guilt from irrational beliefs, religious affiliation and religiosity

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, December 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Predicting guilt from irrational beliefs, religious affiliation and religiosity
Published in
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, December 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf01061292
Authors

Thomas Demaria, Howard Kassinove

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 27%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Professor 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 47%
Arts and Humanities 2 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Neuroscience 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy
#72
of 199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,280
of 53,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them