↓ Skip to main content

Older Patients’ Compliance with Drug Storage Recommendations

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs & Aging, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
Title
Older Patients’ Compliance with Drug Storage Recommendations
Published in
Drugs & Aging, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40266-018-0524-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolaas D. Vlieland, Bart J. F. van den Bemt, Charlotte L. Bekker, Marcel L. Bouvy, Toine C. G. Egberts, Helga Gardarsdottir

Abstract

Whereas storage conditions are regulated and closely monitored in every stage of the drug supply chain before drug dispensing, it is unknown if patients store drugs at home according to storage recommendations. The objective of this study was to investigate how older patients store their prescription drugs at home and to what extent they comply with drug storage recommendations. We conducted a cross-sectional study between October 2015 and March 2016. Forty-four participating Dutch community pharmacies selected four home-dwelling patients (aged ≥ 65 years) using at least one prescription drug. A complete drug inventory at patients' homes was performed. Drugs were considered to fulfill the storage recommendation when these met all drug quality (Q) and information (I) criteria: adequately stored according to drug product label storage recommendations for temperature, light, humidity (Q1); expiry date not passed (Q2); integer primary package (Q3); drug identifiability (I1); drug package insert or information leaflet availability (I2). One hundred and seventy patients [53.5% female, mean age 74.9 (standard deviation 7.3) years] were included and 1133 prescription drugs stored at home were registered. More than half of the patients (51.2%) complied with all storage quality and information criteria. Assessment of the individual criteria showed that 76.4% of patients were compliant with criterion Q1 while 90.6, 95.3, 97.1 and 71.2% of patients complied with criteria Q2, Q3, I1 and I2, respectively. 53.2% of drugs that should be kept refrigerated according to storage criterion Q1 were not stored between 2 and 8 °C. This study illustrates that more than half of the older patients comply with general drug storage recommendations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 96 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 5 5%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 37 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Engineering 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 37 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2018.
All research outputs
#12,948,080
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Drugs & Aging
#848
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,972
of 439,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs & Aging
#15
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.