↓ Skip to main content

Hypocrealean fungi associated with populations of Ips typographus in West Carpathians and selection of local Beauveria strains for effective bark beetle control

Overview of attention for article published in Biologia, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Hypocrealean fungi associated with populations of Ips typographus in West Carpathians and selection of local Beauveria strains for effective bark beetle control
Published in
Biologia, February 2018
DOI 10.2478/s11756-018-0005-x
Authors

Marek Barta, Ivona Kautmanová, Helena Čičková, Ján Ferenčík, Štefan Florián, Július Novotný, Milan Kozánek

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Unspecified 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 50%
Environmental Science 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2018.
All research outputs
#15,492,327
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Biologia
#253
of 381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,137
of 437,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biologia
#12
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 381 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.