| Title |
Evidence of exploitative competition among young stages of the wolf spider Schizocosa ocreata
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, August 1992
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00317234 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David H. Wise, James D. Wagner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 36% |
| Professor | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 68% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,674
of 4,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,411
of 18,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.