↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic transformation of vestibular signals for orientation

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Dynamic transformation of vestibular signals for orientation
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00221-012-3250-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Callum J. Osler, Raymond F. Reynolds

Abstract

The same pattern of vestibular afferent feedback may signify a loss of balance or a change in body orientation, depending upon the initial head posture. To resolve this ambiguity and generate an appropriate motor response, the CNS must transform vestibular information from a head-centred reference frame into relevant motor coordinates. But what if the reference frame is continuously moving? Here, we ask if this neural transformation process is continuously updated during a voluntary change in head posture. Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) was used to induce a sensation of head roll motion in blindfolded subjects marching on the spot. When head orientation was fixed, this caused unconscious turning behaviour that was maximal during neck flexion, minimal with the head level and reversed direction with neck extension. Subjects were then asked to produce a continuous voluntary change in head pitch, while GVS was applied. As the neck moved from full flexion into extension, turn velocity was continuously modulated and even reversed direction, reflecting the pattern observed during the head-fixed condition. Hence, an identical vestibular input resulted in motor output which was dynamically modulated by changes in head pitch. However, response magnitude was significantly reduced, suggesting possible suppression of vestibular input during voluntary head movement. Nevertheless, these results show that the CNS continuously reinterprets vestibular exafference to account for ongoing voluntary changes in head posture. This may explain why the head can be moved freely without losing the sense of balance and orientation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 3%
Japan 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Belgium 1 3%
Unknown 33 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 27%
Researcher 4 11%
Lecturer 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 12 32%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 8 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 19%
Sports and Recreations 6 16%
Psychology 3 8%
Engineering 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,585,435
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#910
of 3,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,798
of 171,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#4
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.