↓ Skip to main content

Functional regulation of human neutrophil Fc γ receptors

Overview of attention for article published in Immunologic Research, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Functional regulation of human neutrophil Fc γ receptors
Published in
Immunologic Research, January 2004
DOI 10.1385/ir:29:1-3:219
Pubmed ID
Authors

Periasamy Selvaraj, Nimita Fifadara, Shanmugam Nagarajan, Ashley Cimino, Guixian Wang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 66 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 14 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 7 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Immunologic Research
#315
of 948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,568
of 143,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunologic Research
#9
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.