↓ Skip to main content

Epigenetic regulation of hematopoiesis

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Hematology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
Title
Epigenetic regulation of hematopoiesis
Published in
International Journal of Hematology, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12185-012-1183-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Goro Sashida, Atsushi Iwama

Abstract

Epigenetic regulation is required not only for development, but also for tissue homeostasis, which is maintained via the self-renewal and differentiation of somatic stem cells. Accumulating evidence suggests that epigenetic regulators play critical roles in the maintenance of both self-renewing hematopoietic stem cells and leukemic stem cells. Recent genome-wide comprehensive analyses have identified mutations in epigenetic regulator genes, including genes whose products modify DNA and histones in hematological malignancies. Among these epigenetic regulators, repressive histone modifications by Polycomb-group complexes have been most fully characterized in hematopoietic stem cells, and are recognized as general regulators of stem cells. Hematopoietic stem cells are controlled by both cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic regulators, including transcription factors, signal transduction pathways, and niche factors. However, there is little insight into the mechanism of how epigenetic regulators act in concert with these factors to ensure blood homeostasis. In this review, we highlight recent findings in epigenetic regulation of hematopoiesis with emphasis on the role of Polycomb-group proteins and DNA-methylation modulators in hematopoietic stem cells and their progeny.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 106 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 27%
Researcher 23 21%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 16 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Hematology
#253
of 1,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,589
of 172,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Hematology
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,392 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.