↓ Skip to main content

Therapeutic activity of C5a receptor antagonists in a rat model of neurodegeneration

Overview of attention for article published in FASEB Journal, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
8 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Therapeutic activity of C5a receptor antagonists in a rat model of neurodegeneration
Published in
FASEB Journal, July 2006
DOI 10.1096/fj.05-5814com
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trent M. Woodruff, James W. Crane, Lavinia M. Proctor, Kathryn M. Buller, Annie B. Shek, Kurt De Vos, Sandra Pollitt, Hua M. Williams, Ian A. Shiels, Peter N. Monk, And Stephen M. Taylor

Abstract

The complement system is thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of numerous neurological diseases, although its precise role remains controversial. In this study we used orally active C5a receptor antagonists (PMX53 and PMX205) developed in our laboratories in a rat model of 3-nitropropionic acid (3-NP) -induced Huntington's disease. Administration of the C5a antagonists (10 mg/kg/day, oral) either 48 h pre- or 48 h post-toxin significantly reduced body weight loss, anorexia, and behavioral and motor deficits associated with 3-NP intoxication. Striatal lesion size, apoptosis, neutrophil infiltration, and hemorrhage were also significantly reduced in C5a antagonist-treated rats. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated marked deposition of C3 and C9, and up-regulation of C5a receptors on neuronal cells at the time of lesion formation. Inhibition of prostaglandins or TNF-alpha with ibuprofen or infliximab had no effect in this model. The C5a antagonists did not affect 3-NP-induced cell death when added directly to rat striatal neuronal cultures, indicating a secondary mechanism of action in vivo. Our findings demonstrate for the first time that complement activation in the brain, particularly C5a, is a key event in the pathogenesis of this disease model, and suggest a future role for inhibitors of C5a in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 151 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 24%
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 6%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 17 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 14%
Neuroscience 11 7%
Engineering 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 24 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,866,364
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from FASEB Journal
#1,132
of 11,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,272
of 88,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from FASEB Journal
#7
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.