↓ Skip to main content

PARP inhibitors in platinum-sensitive high-grade serous ovarian cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
PARP inhibitors in platinum-sensitive high-grade serous ovarian cancer
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00280-018-3532-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert D. Morgan, Andrew R. Clamp, D. Gareth R. Evans, Richard J. Edmondson, Gordon C. Jayson

Abstract

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have changed the management of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). The rationale for the development of PARPi was based on the concept of synthetic lethality, in which a cell can survive a deficiency of one gene/gene product, but may die if there is a deficiency in a combination of genes/gene products. In women with BRCA1/2 deficiency within their ovarian cancer tissue, inhibition of PARP imposes an intolerable burden of DNA damage repair deficiency and may induce cell death. Clinical trials have evaluated PARPi as single-agent therapeutics and as maintenance treatment following platinum-based chemotherapy for HGSOC. Clinical data suggest the most impressive anti-tumour activity occurs in women with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer and germline or somatic BRCA1/2 mutations (g/sBRCAmt). In the maintenance setting, randomised trials have shown that PARPi compared to placebo reduce the hazard ratio for the development of progressive disease to 0.2-0.27 for patients with a g/sBRCAmt; to 0.34-0.38 for patients with putative evidence of DNA damage repair deficiency; and to 0.35-0.45 in an unselected population with HGSOC. Furthermore, phase 1/2 trials have reported single-agent anti-tumour response rates in gBRCAmt of approximately 50% in platinum-sensitive and 25% in platinum-resistant disease. Here, we discuss the evidence for the use of PARPi as single-agent therapeutics and maintenance treatment in HGSOC and evaluate the genetic assays used in clinical trials so far. We discuss the emerging role of platinum sensitivity as a broad eligibility criteria for the use of PARPi.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 19%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Master 11 10%
Other 10 9%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 26 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 31 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2018.
All research outputs
#14,599,162
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#1,760
of 2,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,162
of 332,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#12
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,501 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.