↓ Skip to main content

Cryptococcus-Related Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome (IRIS): Pathogenesis and its Clinical Implications

Overview of attention for article published in Current Fungal Infection Reports, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 156)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Cryptococcus-Related Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome (IRIS): Pathogenesis and its Clinical Implications
Published in
Current Fungal Infection Reports, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s12281-011-0064-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Darin L. Wiesner, David R. Boulware

Abstract

This review provides an overview of Cryptococcus neoformans immunology and focuses on the pathogenesis of Cryptococcus-related paradoxical immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS). Cryptococcal IRIS has three phases: (1) before antiretroviral therapy (ART), with a paucity of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) inflammation and defects in antigen clearance; (2) during initial ART immune recovery, with pro-inflammatory signaling by antigen-presenting cells without an effector response; and (3) at IRIS, a cytokine storm with a predominant type-1 helper T-cell (Th(1)) interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) response. Understanding IRIS pathogenesis allows for risk stratification and customization of HIV/AIDS care. In brief, persons at high IRIS risk may benefit from enhancing microbiologic clearance by use of adjunctive agents in combination with amphotericin, prolonging initial induction therapy, and/or increasing the initial consolidation antifungal therapy dose to at least 800 mg of fluconazole daily until the 2-week CSF culture is known to be sterile. Prophylactic anti-inflammatory therapies or undue delay of ART initiation in an attempt to prevent IRIS is unwarranted and may be dangerous.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 19%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 4 6%
Other 15 23%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 11 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Current Fungal Infection Reports
#43
of 156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,127
of 119,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Fungal Infection Reports
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 156 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them