| Title |
Assessment of large-vertebrate species richness and relative abundance in Neotropical forest using line-transect censuses: what is the minimal effort required?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-008-9337-0 |
| Authors |
Benoît de Thoisy, Sébastien Brosse, Marc A. Dubois |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 14 | 5% |
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 223 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 68 | 27% |
| Researcher | 59 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 6% |
| Professor | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 36 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 158 | 62% |
| Environmental Science | 55 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 27 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2014.
All research outputs
#7,916,538
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,131
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,004
of 160,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.