↓ Skip to main content

Occurrence, functions and biosynthesis of polyamides in microorganisms and biotechnological production

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, February 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
179 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Occurrence, functions and biosynthesis of polyamides in microorganisms and biotechnological production
Published in
The Science of Nature, February 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00114-001-0280-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. B. Oppermann-Sanio, Alexander Steinbüchel

Abstract

Microorganisms are able to synthesize three different polyamides by enzymatic processes independently from ribosomal protein biosynthesis: poly(gamma-D-glutamic acid), poly(epsilon-L-lysine) and multi-L-arginyl-poly(L-aspartic acid) which is also referred to as cyanophycin. These polyamides, which occur mainly in Bacillus spp. (and only a few other eubacteria and the nematocysts of Cnidaria, in Streptomyces albulus or in cyanobacteria, respectively), have recently attracted considerable interest of the chemical industry and may be suitable for various applications. This review summarizes our current knowledge on the occurrence, biosynthesis, physiological functions, and biodegradation as well as on the properties and putative applications of these polyamides. Emphasis is placed on the enzymology of the polymerization and on the genes encoding the polymerizing enzymes, which have only recently become available for cyanophycin synthetases. Prospects for novel production processes. in particular for cyanophycin, are also presented.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 131 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 17%
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Professor 6 4%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 22 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 14%
Chemistry 11 8%
Materials Science 10 7%
Engineering 10 7%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 26 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,460,684
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#433
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,686
of 55,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 55,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.