↓ Skip to main content

Cumulative Risk and Impact Modeling on Environmental Chemical and Social Stressors

Overview of attention for article published in Current Environmental Health Reports, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Cumulative Risk and Impact Modeling on Environmental Chemical and Social Stressors
Published in
Current Environmental Health Reports, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40572-018-0180-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hongtai Huang, Aolin Wang, Rachel Morello-Frosch, Juleen Lam, Marina Sirota, Amy Padula, Tracey J. Woodruff

Abstract

The goal of this review is to identify cumulative modeling methods used to evaluate combined effects of exposures to environmental chemicals and social stressors. The specific review question is: What are the existing quantitative methods used to examine the cumulative impacts of exposures to environmental chemical and social stressors on health? There has been an increase in literature that evaluates combined effects of exposures to environmental chemicals and social stressors on health using regression models; very few studies applied other data mining and machine learning techniques to this problem. The majority of studies we identified used regression models to evaluate combined effects of multiple environmental and social stressors. With proper study design and appropriate modeling assumptions, additional data mining methods may be useful to examine combined effects of environmental and social stressors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 32 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 9 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Psychology 4 6%
Computer Science 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 34 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2018.
All research outputs
#17,930,799
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Current Environmental Health Reports
#287
of 324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#314,628
of 446,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Environmental Health Reports
#16
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.