↓ Skip to main content

Yeast communities in a natural tequila fermentation

Overview of attention for article published in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, August 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
q&a
2 Q&A threads

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
Title
Yeast communities in a natural tequila fermentation
Published in
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, August 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf00873100
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc-André Lachance

Abstract

Fresh and cooked agave, Drosophila spp., processing equipment, agave molasses, agave extract, and fermenting must at a traditional tequila distillery (Herradura, Amatitan, Jalisco, México) were studied to gain insight on the origin of yeasts involved in a natural tequila fermentations. Five yeast communities were identified. (1) Fresh agave contained a diverse mycobiota dominated by Clavispora lusitaniae and an endemic species, Metschnikowia agaveae. (2) Drosophila spp. from around or inside the distillery yielded typical fruit yeasts, in particular Hanseniaspora spp., Pichia kluyveri, and Candida krusei. (3) Schizosaccharomyces pombe prevailed in molasses. (4) Cooked agave and extract had a considerable diversity of species, but included Saccharomyces cerevisiae. (5) Fermenting juice underwent a gradual reduction in yeast heterogeneity. Torulaspora delbrueckii, Kluyveromyces marxianus, and Hanseniaspora spp. progressively ceded the way to S. cerevisiae, Zygosaccharomyces bailii, Candida milleri, and Brettanomyces spp. With the exception of Pichia membranaefaciens, which was shared by all communities, little overlap existed. That separation was even more manifest when species were divided into distinguishable biotypes based on morphology or physiology. It is concluded that crushing equipment and must holding tanks are the main source of significant inoculum for the fermentation process. Drosophila species appear to serve as internal vectors. Proximity to fruit trees probably contributes to maintaining a substantial Drosophila community, but the yeasts found in the distillery exhibit very little similarity to those found in adjacent vegetation. Interactions involving killer toxins had no apparent direct effects on the yeast community structure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 3 2%
France 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 137 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 20%
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 27 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 19%
Environmental Science 7 5%
Chemistry 6 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 27 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,114,187
of 25,382,250 outputs
Outputs from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#222
of 2,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,615
of 22,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,162 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them