↓ Skip to main content

Albionella fabricii n. sp. (Copepoda: Lernaeopodidae) from the gills of Centroscyllium fabricii from the Northwest Atlantic

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Parasitology, May 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Albionella fabricii n. sp. (Copepoda: Lernaeopodidae) from the gills of Centroscyllium fabricii from the Northwest Atlantic
Published in
Systematic Parasitology, May 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf00010002
Authors

Louise A. Rubec, William E. Hogans

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Parasitology
#149
of 732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,756
of 13,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Parasitology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 732 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them