↓ Skip to main content

Type IV Bartter syndrome: report of two new cases

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Type IV Bartter syndrome: report of two new cases
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, April 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00467-006-0090-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Zaffanello, Anna Taranta, Alessia Palma, Alberto Bettinelli, Gian Luigi Marseglia, Francesco Emma

Abstract

Bartter syndrome with sensorineural deafness (type IV Bartter syndrome) is a subtype of this tubular disease, and is due to mutations in the BSND gene. Out of a population of 92 patients with Bartter syndrome, five suffered from mild to severe hypoacusia and were selected for mutational screening. A homozygous mutation in the BSND gene was found in two female patients. The first patient was found to have a substitution in intron 1 donor splice site at position +5 (c.420+5G>C), whereas the second patient has a homozygous 3G>A substitution leading to the loss of the start codon for the translation of the BSND mRNA. The clinical courses of these two patients were remarkable for severe polyhydramnios, massive renal salt and water wasting, severe neonatal hypotonia, poor growth and unresponsiveness to prostaglandin inhibitors. The diuretic responses to furosemide and to hydrochlorothiazide were tested under KCl supplementation in one patient. A lack of response to both drugs suggested that inhibition of NaCl reabsorption in type IV Bartter syndrome is not restricted to the thick ascending limb of Henle. In one patient, a combined therapy with indomethacin and captopril was needed to discontinue intravenous fluids and improve weight gain.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 15%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Lecturer 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 8 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#1,857
of 4,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,180
of 84,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.