↓ Skip to main content

Religiosity, Spirituality, and Socioemotional Functioning in Mothers of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
Title
Religiosity, Spirituality, and Socioemotional Functioning in Mothers of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10803-008-0673-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naomi V. Ekas, Thomas L. Whitman, Carolyn Shivers

Abstract

Religious beliefs, religious activities, and spirituality are coping resources used by many mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This study examined whether and how these resources were related to maternal socioemotional functioning. Mothers of children with ASD completed questionnaires assessing religiosity, spirituality, and a wide range of outcome variables, including stress, depression, self-esteem, life satisfaction, positive affect, and sense of control. Analyses revealed that religious beliefs and spirituality were associated with better positive outcomes and, to a lesser extent, lower levels of negative outcomes. Of the two predictors, spirituality accounted for more unique variance in positive outcomes. In contrast, religious activities were related to more negative outcomes and lower levels of positive outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Israel 1 <1%
Unknown 190 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 19%
Student > Master 25 13%
Researcher 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 45 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 77 40%
Social Sciences 24 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 2%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 56 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2021.
All research outputs
#4,330,002
of 25,880,422 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,693
of 5,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,872
of 182,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.