↓ Skip to main content

Structure of joint variability in bimanual pointing tasks

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, December 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Structure of joint variability in bimanual pointing tasks
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, December 2001
DOI 10.1007/s00221-001-0944-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dmitry Domkin, Jozsef Laczko, Slobodan Jaric, Hakan Johansson, Mark L. Latash

Abstract

Changes in the structure of motor variability during practicing a bimanual pointing task were investigated using the framework of the uncontrolled manifold (UCM) hypothesis. The subjects performed fast and accurate planar movements with both arms, one moving the pointer and the other moving the target. The UCM hypothesis predicts that joint kinematic variability will be structured to selectively stabilize important task variables. This prediction was tested with respect to selective stabilization of the trajectory of the endpoint of each arm (unimanual control hypotheses) and with respect to selective stabilization of the timecourse of the vectorial distance between the target and the pointer tip (bimanual control hypothesis). Components of joint position variance not affecting and affecting a mean value of a selected variable were computed at each 10% of normalized movement time. The ratio of these two components ( R(V)) served as a quantitative index of selective stabilization. Both unimanual control hypotheses and the bimanual control hypothesis were supported both prior to and after practice. However, the R(V) values for the bimanual control hypothesis were significantly higher than for either of the unimanual control hypothesis, suggesting that the bimanual synergy was not simply a simultaneous execution of two unimanual synergies. After practice, an improvement in both movement speed and accuracy was accompanied by counterintuitive changes in the structure of kinematic variability. Components of joint position variance affecting and not affecting a mean value of a selected variable decreased, but there was a significantly larger drop in the latter when applied on each of the three selected task variables corresponding to the three control hypotheses. We conclude that the UCM hypothesis allows quantitative assessment of the degree of stabilization of selected performance variables and provides information on changes in the structure of a multijoint synergy that may not be reflected in its overall performance.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Germany 3 1%
Italy 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 200 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 29%
Researcher 34 15%
Student > Master 26 12%
Professor 19 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 8%
Other 40 18%
Unknown 20 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 39 18%
Sports and Recreations 36 16%
Psychology 34 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 11%
Neuroscience 22 10%
Other 40 18%
Unknown 26 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#900
of 3,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,825
of 123,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.