↓ Skip to main content

An ecological comparison of two sympatric primates:Saguinus fuscicollis andCallicebus moloch of Amazonian Peru

Overview of attention for article published in Primates, October 1988
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
An ecological comparison of two sympatric primates:Saguinus fuscicollis andCallicebus moloch of Amazonian Peru
Published in
Primates, October 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf02381134
Authors

Janis Crandlemire-Sacco

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 23%
Student > Master 10 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 19%
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 60%
Environmental Science 4 9%
Psychology 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 7 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2014.
All research outputs
#4,696,096
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#314
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,500
of 13,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them