Title |
An ecological comparison of two sympatric primates:Saguinus fuscicollis andCallicebus moloch of Amazonian Peru
|
---|---|
Published in |
Primates, October 1988
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf02381134 |
Authors |
Janis Crandlemire-Sacco |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 45 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 23% |
Student > Master | 10 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 19% |
Researcher | 7 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 4 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 60% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 9% |
Psychology | 3 | 6% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2014.
All research outputs
#4,696,096
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#314
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,500
of 13,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them