↓ Skip to main content

Distinct transgenic effects of poplar TDIF genes on vascular development in Arabidopsis

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Cell Reports, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Distinct transgenic effects of poplar TDIF genes on vascular development in Arabidopsis
Published in
Plant Cell Reports, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00299-018-2268-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xin Li, Heyu Yang, Caili Wang, Shaohui Yang, Jiehua Wang

Abstract

Poplar CLE genes encoding TDIF motifs differentially regulate vascular cambial cell division and woody tissue organization in transgenic Arabidopsis. In Arabidopsis, CLE41 and CLE44 genes encode the tracheary element differentiation inhibitory factor (TDIF) peptide, which functions as a non-cell autonomous signal to regulate vascular development, and overexpression of AtCLE41/CLE44 generate similar phenotypic defects. In poplar, there are six CLE genes (PtTDIF1-4 and PtTDIF-like1-2) encoding two TDIF peptides (TDIF and TDIF-like peptide), which exhibit nearly same activities when exogenously applied to Arabidopsis seedlings. In this work, for each TDIF peptide, we chose two poplar CLE genes (PtTDIF2 and 3 for TDIF, and PtTDIF-like1-2 for TDIF-like peptide) to compare their in vivo effects in transgenic Arabidopsis. Our results showed that transgenic Arabidopsis lines overexpressing each individual PtTDIF gene exhibited dramatically distinct phenotypes associated with vascular development, demonstrating that TDIF motif is not the only functional determinant after genetic transformation. Moreover, we revealed that overexpressed poplar TDIFs enhanced the proliferation of (pro)cambial cells only in hypocotyls, but not in inflorescence stems by differentially regulating the transcriptional levels of WOX4 and WOX14 in these two tissues.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 38%
Unspecified 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Unspecified 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#5,535,900
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Plant Cell Reports
#526
of 2,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,457
of 330,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Cell Reports
#16
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,197 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.