| Title |
Comparison of metabolic pathways of different α-N-heterocyclic thiosemicarbazones
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00216-018-0889-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karla Pelivan, Lisa M. Frensemeier, Uwe Karst, Gunda Koellensperger, Petra Heffeter, Bernhard K. Keppler, Christian R. Kowol |
| Abstract |
Clinical failure of novel drugs is often related to their rapid metabolism and excretion. This highlights the importance of elucidation of their pharmacokinetic profile already at the preclinical stage of drug development. Triapine, the most prominent representative of α-N-heterocyclic thiosemicarbazones, was investigated in more than 30 clinical phase I/II trials, but the results against solid tumors were disappointing. Recent investigations from our group suggested that this is, at least partially, based on the fast metabolism and excretion. In order to establish more detailed structure/activity/metabolism relationships, herein a panel of 10 different Triapine derivatives was investigated for their metabolic pathways. From the biological point of view, the panel consists of terminally dimethylated thiosemicarbazones with nanomolar IC50values, derivatives with micromolar cytotoxicities comparable to Triapine and a completely inactive representative. To study the oxidative metabolism, a purely instrumental approach based on electrochemistry/mass spectrometry was applied and the results were compared to the data obtained from microsomal incubations. Overall, the investigated thiosemicarbazones underwent the phase I metabolic reactions dehydrogenation, hydroxylation, oxidative desulfuration (to semicarbazone and amidrazone) and demethylation. Notably, dehydrogenation resulted in a ring-closure reaction with formation of thiadiazoles. Although strong differences between the metabolic pathways of the different thiosemicarbazones were observed, they could not be directly correlated to their cytotoxicities. Finally, the metabolic pathways for the most cytotoxic compound were elucidated also in tissues collected from drug-treated mice, confirming the data obtained by electrochemical oxidation and microsomes. In addition, the in vivo experiments revealed a very fast metabolism and excretion of the compound. Graphical abstract Structure/activity/metabolisation relationships for 10 anticancer thiosemicarbazones were established using electrochemical oxidation coupled to mass spectrometry (EC-MS) and human liver microsomes analyzed by LC-MS. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 8 | 35% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#6,602
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,709
of 343,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#121
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.