↓ Skip to main content

Recent advances in therapeutic strategies for unresectable or metastatic melanoma and real-world data in Japan

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Oncology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Recent advances in therapeutic strategies for unresectable or metastatic melanoma and real-world data in Japan
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10147-018-1246-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hisashi Uhara

Abstract

New therapeutic strategies including immunotherapy and selective molecular target inhibitors have brought about a new era in the treatment of patients with advanced melanoma. In Japan, the immune checkpoint inhibitors ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab, the BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) vemurafenib, dabrafenib and MEK inhibitor (MEKi) trametinib have been available for the treatment of unresectable and metastatic melanoma. The BRAFi + MEKi combination shows high response rates (60-70%) and rapid response induction associated with symptom control, with a progression-free survival of 12 months. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab offer moderate response rates (30-40%) and long survival (3- to 5-year survival: 30-50%). In Japan, treatment options for the first-line setting frequently include nivolumab or pembrolizumab monotherapy and BRAFi + MEKi combinations (for patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma). Ipilimumab is included in the second-line setting, and the nivolumab + ipilimumab combination has not been approved yet in Japan. Although these medications have demonstrated impressive efficacy, the clinical trials and real-world data have shown that the clinical benefit is not fully satisfactory. We have to carefully manage a new class of adverse events due to these medicines. Moreover, biomarkers are emerging with which we can identify a population that would experience more benefits without severe adverse events.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 15 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 19 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2018.
All research outputs
#20,466,701
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Oncology
#618
of 921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,444
of 330,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Oncology
#14
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 921 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.