↓ Skip to main content

Red and Green Algal Monophyly and Extensive Gene Sharing Found in a Rich Repertoire of Red Algal Genes

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Red and Green Algal Monophyly and Extensive Gene Sharing Found in a Rich Repertoire of Red Algal Genes
Published in
Current Biology, February 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2011.01.037
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheong Xin Chan, Eun Chan Yang, Titas Banerjee, Hwan Su Yoon, Patrick T. Martone, José M. Estevez, Debashish Bhattacharya

Abstract

The Plantae comprising red, green (including land plants), and glaucophyte algae are postulated to have a single common ancestor that is the founding lineage of photosynthetic eukaryotes. However, recent multiprotein phylogenies provide little or no support for this hypothesis. This may reflect limited complete genome data available for red algae, currently only the highly reduced genome of Cyanidioschyzon merolae, a reticulate gene ancestry, or variable gene divergence rates that mislead phylogenetic inference. Here, using novel genome data from the mesophilic Porphyridium cruentum and Calliarthron tuberculosum, we analyze 60,000 novel red algal genes to test the monophyly of red + green (RG) algae and their extent of gene sharing with other lineages. Using a gene-by-gene approach, we find an emerging signal of RG monophyly (supported by ∼50% of the examined protein phylogenies) that increases with the number of distinct phyla and terminal taxa in the analysis. A total of 1,808 phylogenies show evidence of gene sharing between Plantae and other lineages. We demonstrate that a rich mesophilic red algal gene repertoire is crucial for testing controversial issues in eukaryote evolution and for understanding the complex patterns of gene inheritance in protists.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 3%
Canada 4 3%
France 3 2%
United States 3 2%
Czechia 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 100 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 22%
Student > Master 12 10%
Professor 9 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 10 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 84 69%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 13%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 12 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#9,719
of 14,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,039
of 193,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#54
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.9. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.