↓ Skip to main content

A unified approach to the definition of random sequences

Overview of attention for article published in Theory of Computing Systems, September 1971
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 217)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
179 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
A unified approach to the definition of random sequences
Published in
Theory of Computing Systems, September 1971
DOI 10.1007/bf01694181
Authors

C. P. Schnorr

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 29%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 15 44%
Engineering 10 29%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Mathematics 2 6%
Unknown 5 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2018.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Theory of Computing Systems
#45
of 217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#720
of 3,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theory of Computing Systems
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them