↓ Skip to main content

Pearl Millet and Kintampo Subsistence

Overview of attention for article published in African Archaeological Review, September 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Pearl Millet and Kintampo Subsistence
Published in
African Archaeological Review, September 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1016518919072
Authors

A. C. D'Andrea, J. Casey

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
United Kingdom 2 3%
Argentina 2 3%
Unknown 66 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Other 19 26%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 19 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 25%
Arts and Humanities 10 14%
Unspecified 6 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 11 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from African Archaeological Review
#158
of 394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,023
of 48,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from African Archaeological Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them