↓ Skip to main content

Diversity of Mammomonogamus (Nematoda: Syngamidae) in large African herbivores

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Diversity of Mammomonogamus (Nematoda: Syngamidae) in large African herbivores
Published in
Parasitology Research, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00436-018-5777-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbora Červená, Kristýna Hrazdilová, Peter Vallo, Barbora Pafčo, Tereza Fenyková, Klára Judita Petrželková, Angelique Todd, Nikki Tagg, Nadege Wangue, Estevam G. Lux Hoppe, Marcela Figuerêdo Duarte Moraes, Ivan Moura Lapera, Andressa de Souza Pollo, Ana Cláudia Alexandre de Albuquerque, David Modrý

Abstract

Four species of Mammomonogamus are known from large African herbivores. A recent study demonstrated that a single Mammomonogamus species was shared by both western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) and African forest elephants (Loxodonta cyclotis) in Central African Republic, suggesting lower species diversity than previously described in literature. We examined more than 500 fecal samples collected from sympatric African forest elephants, western lowland gorillas, and African forest buffaloes (Syncerus caffer nanus) at four study sites across Central Africa and examined them by coproscopic methods to detect Mammomonogamus eggs, which were found at three of the study sites. Subsequently, sequences of 18S rDNA, 28S rDNA, and cox1 amplified from individual eggs were analyzed. Phylogenetic analyses of both nuclear and mitochondrial DNA revealed two clades: one formed by sequences originating from Gabonese buffaloes and the other comprising gorillas and elephants. The gorilla-elephant clade was further differentiated depending on the locality. We show the existence of at least two distinct species of Mammomonogamus, M. loxodontis in elephants and gorillas and M. nasicola in buffaloes. The available information on Mammomonogamus in African herbivores is reviewed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 10 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 18%
Environmental Science 3 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 12 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,493,741
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#1,800
of 3,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,331
of 330,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#38
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,801 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.