↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Histologic parameters for detecting multiple blood meals in Aedes albopictus (Skuse) (Diptera: Culicidae) during a single gonotrophic cycle

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Histologic parameters for detecting multiple blood meals in Aedes albopictus (Skuse) (Diptera: Culicidae) during a single gonotrophic cycle
Published in
Parasitology Research, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00436-016-5348-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abeer S. Yamany, Fatma K. Adham, Heinz Mehlhorn

Abstract

The histologic technique was used for its usefulness in detecting multiple blood feedings in Aedes albopictus during a single gonotrophic cycle. In a laboratory study, in which 200 blood-engorged Ae. albopictus mosquito females during a 3-day period were examined, 69% (138/200) of these females imbibed two blood meals when the interval between meals was from 8 to 48 h and the time between the second blood meal and fixation ranged from 0 to 32 h. At the interval outside this range, only 23% of the multiple meals were detected when using histologic parameters. Early blood meals were detected clearly within the later blood meals as a delimited body of dark digested blood with heme (H), sometimes also with pink undigested blood, the presence of an associated pale blue-staining peritrophic plug (PP), by the presence and appearance of the peritrophic membrane (PM) surrounding the meals, and a physical separation (PS) between meals. Development of the ovarian follicles including apparent dilatations was also observed. Advanced stages of oocyte development suggests that, at the time of field collection, most Ae. albopictus had fed twice in each gonotrophic cycle. The results obtained during this study indicated that the rate of multiple feeding can be determined using histologic technique which would be useful in evaluating the blood feeding frequency of field-caught tiger mosquitoes Ae. albopictus in endemic areas of viral pathogens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 40%
Other 1 10%
Student > Postgraduate 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 20%
Environmental Science 1 10%
Linguistics 1 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2018.
All research outputs
#18,589,103
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#2,389
of 3,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,513
of 421,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#18
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,801 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.