↓ Skip to main content

Involvement of cannabinoid CB1 receptors in the antinociceptive effect of dipyrone

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neural Transmission, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Involvement of cannabinoid CB1 receptors in the antinociceptive effect of dipyrone
Published in
Journal of Neural Transmission, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00702-013-1052-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pinar Elmas, Ahmet Ulugol

Abstract

Cannabinoid CB1 receptors have been implicated in the antinociceptive effect of paracetamol. In the current study, we examined whether blockade of CB1 receptors prevent the analgesic activity of dipyrone, in a similar way to paracetamol. Hot-plate and tail-flick tests were used to assess the antinociceptive activity in mice. Dipyrone and WIN 55,212-2, a cannabinoid agonist, exerted significant antinociceptive effects in both hot-plate and tail flick tests. The CB1 receptor antagonist, AM-251 (3 mg/kg), at a dose which had no effect when used alone, did not alter the antinociceptive effect of dipyrone, whereas completely prevented the antinociceptive activity of WIN 55,212-2 in both thermal antinociceptive tests. Our findings suggest that, unlike paracetamol, cannabinoid CB1 receptors do not participate in the antinociceptive action of dipyrone when acute pain tests used.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Researcher 4 13%
Professor 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 42%
Chemistry 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neural Transmission
#630
of 1,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,661
of 196,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neural Transmission
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.