| Title |
Critical Evaluation of Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) by NanoSight for the Measurement of Nanoparticles and Protein Aggregates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pharmaceutical Research, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11095-010-0073-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vasco Filipe, Andrea Hawe, Wim Jiskoot |
| Abstract |
To evaluate the nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) technique, compare it with dynamic light scattering (DLS) and test its performance in characterizing drug delivery nanoparticles and protein aggregates. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,021 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | <1% |
| Germany | 6 | <1% |
| Denmark | 4 | <1% |
| Poland | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 19 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1959 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 483 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 303 | 15% |
| Researcher | 238 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 216 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 127 | 6% |
| Other | 224 | 11% |
| Unknown | 430 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 268 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 260 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 216 | 11% |
| Engineering | 182 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 147 | 7% |
| Other | 429 | 21% |
| Unknown | 519 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,252,180
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#88
of 3,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,107
of 106,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#4
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.