↓ Skip to main content

Anatomical considerations on the corona mortis

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Anatomical considerations on the corona mortis
Published in
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, July 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00276-009-0534-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mugurel Constantin Rusu, Romica Cergan, Andrei Gheorghe Marius Motoc, Roxana Folescu, Elena Pop

Abstract

The corona mortis (CMOR) represents the vascular connection of the obturator and external iliac systems. We aimed to evaluate by dissections the morphological possibilities of the CMOR and their individual combinations. For the study we used 20 human adult cadavers that were bilaterally dissected (40 hemipelvises), with evidences of the vascular elements at the level of the superior pubic branch in 32 (80%) of hemipelvises. The morphological patterns we identified were classified in three types (I-III): I. arterial CMOR (10 hemipelvises): I.1. obturator artery (OA) from the external iliac artery (EIA); I.2. OA from the inferior epigastric artery (IEA); I.3. anastomosis of the OA and IEA; I.4. pubic branches of the OA, in the absence of any anastomosis with the EIA system; II. venous CMOR (6 hemipelvises): II.1. obturator vein (OV) draining into the external iliac vein (EIV); II.2. OV draining into the inferior epigastric vein (IEV); II.3. venous anastomosis of the OV and IEV and III combined, arterial and venous CMOR (16 hemipelvises). We classified the combined coronae mortis in nine different subtypes that mainly (but not exclusively) correspond to various combinations of types I and II. The surgical relevance of the vascular relations of the superior branch of pubis (in trauma, orthopedic approaches, hernia repair, embolizations and intra-arterial infusions) recommends a detailed knowledge of the morphological and topographical possibilities of the crown of death and the individual evaluation of this risky anatomical structure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Israel 1 2%
Unknown 43 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 22%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Lecturer 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Other 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 64%
Unspecified 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2021.
All research outputs
#6,764,072
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
#93
of 705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,285
of 113,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 705 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.