↓ Skip to main content

Serum glucose control in diabetic patients with cardiovascular disease: Should we be less aggressive?

Overview of attention for article published in Current Atherosclerosis Reports, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Serum glucose control in diabetic patients with cardiovascular disease: Should we be less aggressive?
Published in
Current Atherosclerosis Reports, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11883-009-0058-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sunder Mudaliar

Abstract

Although aggressive control of hyperglycemia significantly reduces microvascular complications in patients with diabetes, there is no clear evidence that it improves macrovascular cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes. Data from recent studies suggest that intensive treatment of blood glucose has no significant effect on CVD outcomes and may even paradoxically increase cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, especially in older patients with long-standing type 2 diabetes and preexisting CVD. At present, it is prudent to aim for a glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) target of 7%, provided this can be achieved without hypoglycemia and other adverse effects of antidiabetic treatment. Treatment of patients with diabetes should begin early and include intensive efforts to promote a healthy lifestyle. Less stringent HbA(1c) goals may be appropriate in older patients with advanced microvascular and macrovascular disease, other comorbid conditions, and a history of severe hypoglycemia. At all times, cholesterol, blood pressure, and other CVD risk factors should be aggressively managed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Professor 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Unknown 5 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2009.
All research outputs
#8,517,844
of 25,382,360 outputs
Outputs from Current Atherosclerosis Reports
#405
of 859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,708
of 121,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Atherosclerosis Reports
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.