↓ Skip to main content

Rapamycin is efficacious against primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) cell lines in vivo by inhibiting autocrine signaling

Overview of attention for article published in Blood, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
151 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapamycin is efficacious against primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) cell lines in vivo by inhibiting autocrine signaling
Published in
Blood, November 2006
DOI 10.1182/blood-2006-06-028092
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sang-Hoon Sin, Debasmita Roy, Ling Wang, Michelle R. Staudt, Farnaz D. Fakhari, Dhavalkumar D. Patel, David Henry, William J. Harrington, Blossom A. Damania, Dirk P. Dittmer

Abstract

The antitumor potency of the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin (sirolimus) is the subject of intense investigations. Primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) appears as an AIDS-defining lymphoma and like Kaposi sarcoma has been linked to Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV). We find that (1) rapamycin is efficacious against PEL in culture and in a murine xenograft model; (2) mTOR, its activator Akt, and its target p70S6 kinase are phosphorylated in PEL; (3) rapamycin inhibits mTOR signaling as determined by S6 phosphorylation; (4) KSHV transcription is unaffected; (5) inhibition of IL-10 signaling correlates with drug sensitivity; and (6) addition of exogenous IL-10 or IL-6 can reverse the rapamycin growth arrest. This validates sirolimus as a new treatment option for PEL.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 52 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 21%
Researcher 11 21%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 11 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2012.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#14,601
of 33,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,319
of 93,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#120
of 288 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 288 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.