↓ Skip to main content

Parental origin and mechanism of formation of polysomy X: an XXXXX case and four XXXXY cases determined with RFLPs

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, April 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Parental origin and mechanism of formation of polysomy X: an XXXXX case and four XXXXY cases determined with RFLPs
Published in
Human Genetics, April 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf00201538
Pubmed ID
Authors

Han-Xiang Deng, Kyohko Abe, Ikuko Kondo, Masato Tsukahara, Haruyo Inagaki, Isamu Hamada, Yoshimitsu Fukushima, Norio Niikawa

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#933
of 2,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,113
of 18,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them