| Title |
Allostatic load and subsequent all-cause mortality: which biological markers drive the relationship? Findings from a UK birth cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Epidemiology, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10654-018-0364-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raphaële Castagné, Valérie Garès, Maryam Karimi, Marc Chadeau-Hyam, Paolo Vineis, Cyrille Delpierre, Michelle Kelly-Irving, for the Lifepath Consortium |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 23% |
| Portugal | 4 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Italy | 2 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 58% |
| Scientists | 10 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 184 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 45 | 24% |
| Researcher | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 17% |
| Unknown | 45 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 45 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 11% |
| Psychology | 14 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 15% |
| Unknown | 53 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,887,302
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Epidemiology
#282
of 1,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,839
of 347,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Epidemiology
#9
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.