↓ Skip to main content

Chunk and Permeate, a Paraconsistent Inference Strategy. Part I: The Infinitesimal Calculus

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Philosophical Logic, August 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Chunk and Permeate, a Paraconsistent Inference Strategy. Part I: The Infinitesimal Calculus
Published in
Journal of Philosophical Logic, August 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:logi.0000036831.48866.12
Authors

Bryson Brown, Graham Priest

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Canada 1 5%
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 18 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 33%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Master 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 10 48%
Arts and Humanities 2 10%
Mathematics 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Philosophical Logic
#64
of 348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,717
of 53,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Philosophical Logic
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 348 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them