↓ Skip to main content

Expert Commentary: Practical Issues in Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immune Deficiency (SCID)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Immunology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Expert Commentary: Practical Issues in Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immune Deficiency (SCID)
Published in
Journal of Clinical Immunology, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10875-011-9598-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer M. Puck, Jack Routes, Alexandra H. Filipovich, Kate Sullivan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Librarian 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 14%
Psychology 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Immunology
#520
of 1,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,655
of 139,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Immunology
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.