↓ Skip to main content

Resource partitioning by four species of elasmobranchs (Batoidea: Urolophidae) in coastal waters of temperate Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Biology, July 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
Title
Resource partitioning by four species of elasmobranchs (Batoidea: Urolophidae) in coastal waters of temperate Australia
Published in
Marine Biology, July 1998
DOI 10.1007/s002270050363
Authors

M. E. Platell, I. C. Potter, K. R. Clarke

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Mozambique 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 117 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 27%
Student > Master 21 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Professor 8 7%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 11 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77 63%
Environmental Science 19 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 17 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#1,340
of 3,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,344
of 32,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.