You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Imaging the genetics of executive function
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Psychology, November 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ciara M. Greene, Wouter Braet, Katherine A. Johnson, Mark A. Bellgrove |
| Abstract |
Recent advances in neuroimaging technologies have allowed ever more detailed studies of the human brain. The combination of neuroimaging techniques with genetics may provide a more sensitive measure of the influence of genetic variants on cognitive function than behavioural measures alone. Here we present a review of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of genetic links to executive functions, focusing on sustained attention, working memory and response inhibition. In addition to studies in the normal population, we also address findings from three clinical populations: schizophrenia, ADHD and autism spectrum disorders. While the findings in the populations studied do not always converge, they all point to the usefulness of neuroimaging techniques such as fMRI as potential endophenotypes for parsing the genetic aetiology of executive function. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| Turkey | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 242 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 22% |
| Researcher | 49 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 64 | 24% |
| Unknown | 28 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 112 | 43% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 27 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 9% |
| Unknown | 38 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biological Psychology
#714
of 1,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,201
of 166,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Psychology
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.