| Title |
Dopamine agonists disrupt visual latent inhibition in normal males using a within-subject paradigm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychopharmacology, February 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00213-002-1325-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neal R. Swerdlow, Nora Stephany, Lindsay C. Wasserman, Jo Talledo, Richard Sharp, Pamela P. Auerbach |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 38 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 20% |
| Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 30% |
| Psychology | 12 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2016.
All research outputs
#6,373,276
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#1,735
of 5,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,875
of 62,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#11
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.