↓ Skip to main content

Intracellular Detection and Evolution of Site-Specific Proteases Using a Genetic Selection System

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Intracellular Detection and Evolution of Site-Specific Proteases Using a Genetic Selection System
Published in
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12010-011-9522-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn D. Verhoeven, Olvia C. Altstadt, Sergey N. Savinov

Abstract

Development of endoproteases, programmed to promote degradation of peptides or proteins responsible for pathogenic states, represents an attractive therapeutic strategy, since such biocatalytic agents could be directed against a potentially unlimited repertoire of extracellular proteinaceous targets. Difficulties associated with engineering enzymes with tailor-made substrate specificities have, however, hindered the discovery of proteases possessing both the efficiency and selectivity to act as therapeutics. Here, we disclose a genetic system, designed to report on site-specific proteolysis through the survival of a bacterial host, and the implementation of this method in the directed evolution of proteases with a non-native substrate preference. The high sensitivity potential of this system was established by monitoring the activity of the Tobacco Etch Virus protease (TEV-Pr) against co-expressed substrates of various recognition level and corroborated by both intracellular and cell-free assays. The genetic selection system was then used in an iterative mode with a library of TEV-Pr mutants to direct the emergence of proteases favoring a nominally poor substrate of the stringently selective protease. The retrieval of mutant enzymes displaying enhanced proteolytic properties against the non-native sequence combined with reduced recognition of the cognate hexapeptide substrate demonstrates the potential of this system for evolving proteases with improved or completely unprecedented properties.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Australia 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Slovenia 1 2%
Unknown 50 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 32%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 21%
Chemistry 9 16%
Engineering 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 12 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,684,170
of 23,381,576 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#555
of 2,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,993
of 249,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#13
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,381,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,556 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.