↓ Skip to main content

Special wound healing methods used in ancient Egypt and the mythological background

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, February 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Special wound healing methods used in ancient Egypt and the mythological background
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, February 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00268-003-7073-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Péter Sipos, Hedvig Gyõry, Krisztina Hagymási, Pál Ondrejka, Anna Blázovics

Abstract

The Egyptian civilisation is one of the oldest in history and was renowned for its scientific and artistic achievements, and medicine was no exception. The ancient Egyptians were masters in applying and arranging bandages, and they recognized the cardinal signs of infection and inflammation. Egyptian drug therapy can be regarded as having evolved from a system rooted in magic and empirical observation. To illustrate how the Egyptian wound healing methods provided a major stimulus for the development of surgery, we conducted a literature search.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 92 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Student > Master 12 13%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 21 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Chemistry 7 7%
Arts and Humanities 6 6%
Other 22 23%
Unknown 25 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,288,210
of 23,462,326 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#137
of 4,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,462
of 135,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,462,326 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.