Title |
Special wound healing methods used in ancient Egypt and the mythological background
|
---|---|
Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, February 2004
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00268-003-7073-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Péter Sipos, Hedvig Gyõry, Krisztina Hagymási, Pál Ondrejka, Anna Blázovics |
Abstract |
The Egyptian civilisation is one of the oldest in history and was renowned for its scientific and artistic achievements, and medicine was no exception. The ancient Egyptians were masters in applying and arranging bandages, and they recognized the cardinal signs of infection and inflammation. Egyptian drug therapy can be regarded as having evolved from a system rooted in magic and empirical observation. To illustrate how the Egyptian wound healing methods provided a major stimulus for the development of surgery, we conducted a literature search. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Uganda | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 92 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
Researcher | 10 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
Other | 14 | 15% |
Unknown | 21 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 10% |
Chemistry | 7 | 7% |
Arts and Humanities | 6 | 6% |
Other | 22 | 23% |
Unknown | 25 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,288,210
of 23,462,326 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#137
of 4,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,462
of 135,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,462,326 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.