↓ Skip to main content

Zooproblematica and mollusca from the Lower Cambrian Meishucun section (Yunnan, China) and taxonomy and systematics of the Cambrian small shelly fossils of China

Overview of attention for article published in Paleontological Journal, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
13 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Zooproblematica and mollusca from the Lower Cambrian Meishucun section (Yunnan, China) and taxonomy and systematics of the Cambrian small shelly fossils of China
Published in
Paleontological Journal, December 2010
DOI 10.1134/s0031030110080010
Authors

P. Yu. Parkhaev, Yu. E. Demidenko

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 26%
Researcher 7 26%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 22%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Paleontological Journal
#138
of 844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,639
of 181,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Paleontological Journal
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 844 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.