↓ Skip to main content

Genetic and Environmental Influences on the Development of Intelligence

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Genetics, July 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
Title
Genetic and Environmental Influences on the Development of Intelligence
Published in
Behavior Genetics, July 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1019772628912
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Bartels, M. J. H. Rietveld, G. C. M. Van Baal, D. I. Boomsma

Abstract

Measures of intelligence were collected in 209 twin pairs at 5, 7, 10, and 12 years of age, as part of a longitudinal project on intelligence, brain function, and behavioral problems. Intelligence was measured at 5, 7, and 10 years of age with the RAKIT, a well-known Dutch intelligence test, consisting of 6 subscales. At 12 years of age, the complete WISC-R was administered (12 subscales). Both intelligence tests resulted in a measure of full-scale IQ (FSIQ). Participation rate is around 93% at age 12. Correlation coefficients over time are high: (r(5-7) = .65; r(5-10) = .65; r(5-12) = .64; r(7-10) = .72; r(7-12) = .69 and r(10-12) = .78). Genetic analyses show significant heritabilities at all ages, with the expected increase of genetic influences and decrease of shared environmental influences over the years. Genetic influences seem to be the main driving force behind continuity in general cognitive ability, represented by a common factor influencing FSIQ at all ages. Shared environmental influences are responsible for stability as well as change in the development of cognitive abilities, represented by a common factor influencing FSIQ at all ages and age-specific influences, respectively.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 3 2%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 177 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 16%
Researcher 29 16%
Student > Master 13 7%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Other 35 19%
Unknown 35 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 76 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 11%
Social Sciences 13 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 6%
Neuroscience 9 5%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 42 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Genetics
#354
of 969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,119
of 47,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Genetics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.