↓ Skip to main content

Radiomic signature as a diagnostic factor for histologic subtype classification of non-small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
168 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Radiomic signature as a diagnostic factor for histologic subtype classification of non-small cell lung cancer
Published in
European Radiology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00330-017-5221-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xinzhong Zhu, Di Dong, Zhendong Chen, Mengjie Fang, Liwen Zhang, Jiangdian Song, Dongdong Yu, Yali Zang, Zhenyu Liu, Jingyun Shi, Jie Tian

Abstract

To distinguish squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) from lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) based on a radiomic signature METHODS: This study involved 129 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (81 in the training cohort and 48 in the independent validation cohort). Approximately 485 features were extracted from a manually outlined tumor region. The LASSO logistic regression model selected the key features of a radiomic signature. Receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the performance of the radiomic signature in the training and validation cohorts. Five features were selected to construct the radiomic signature for histologic subtype classification. The performance of the radiomic signature to distinguish between lung ADC and SCC in both training and validation cohorts was good, with an AUC of 0.905 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.838 to 0.971), sensitivity of 0.830, and specificity of 0.929. In the validation cohort, the radiomic signature showed an AUC of 0.893 (95% CI: 0.789 to 0.996), sensitivity of 0.828, and specificity of 0.900. A unique radiomic signature was constructed for use as a diagnostic factor for discriminating lung ADC from SCC. Patients with NSCLC will benefit from the proposed radiomic signature. • Machine learning can be used for auxiliary distinguish in lung cancer. • Radiomic signature can discriminate lung ADC from SCC. • Radiomics can help to achieve precision medical treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 121 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 17%
Student > Master 14 12%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 40 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 29%
Engineering 12 10%
Computer Science 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Physics and Astronomy 4 3%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 48 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,466,701
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#3,351
of 4,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#408,033
of 474,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#69
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,170 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.