↓ Skip to main content

Managing flood risks in the Mekong Delta: How to address emerging challenges under climate change and socioeconomic developments

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
Title
Managing flood risks in the Mekong Delta: How to address emerging challenges under climate change and socioeconomic developments
Published in
Ambio, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13280-017-1009-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Long Phi Hoang, Robbert Biesbroek, Van Pham Dang Tri, Matti Kummu, Michelle T. H. van Vliet, Rik Leemans, Pavel Kabat, Fulco Ludwig

Abstract

Climate change and accelerating socioeconomic developments increasingly challenge flood-risk management in the Vietnamese Mekong River Delta-a typical large, economically dynamic and highly vulnerable delta. This study identifies and addresses the emerging challenges for flood-risk management. Furthermore, we identify and analyse response solutions, focusing on meaningful configurations of the individual solutions and how they can be tailored to specific challenges using expert surveys, content analysis techniques and statistical inferences. Our findings show that the challenges for flood-risk management are diverse, but critical challenges predominantly arise from the current governance and institutional settings. The top-three challenges include weak collaboration, conflicting management objectives and low responsiveness to new issues. We identified 114 reported solutions and developed six flood management strategies that are tailored to specific challenges. We conclude that the current technology-centric flood management approach is insufficient given the rapid socioecological changes. This approach therefore should be adapted towards a more balanced management configuration where technical and infrastructural measures are combined with institutional and governance resolutions. Insights from this study contribute to the emerging repertoire of contemporary flood management solutions, especially through their configurations and tailoring to specific challenges.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 152 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 16%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 52 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 27 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 10%
Social Sciences 12 8%
Engineering 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 61 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,891,399
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#812
of 1,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,215
of 345,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#16
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.