↓ Skip to main content

Psoriatic arthritis: tissue-directed inflammation?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Psoriatic arthritis: tissue-directed inflammation?
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10067-018-4012-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giacomo Cafaro, Iain B. McInnes

Abstract

The clinical picture of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is heterogeneous, potentially involving numerous organs and tissues, such as skin and joint. From a clinical point of view, discrete tissue PsA features develop and respond to treatments apparently independently. The pathogenic events occurring in the various tissues are only partially understood. Although the vast majority of known genetic predisposing factors are shared between patients with skin psoriasis (PSO) and those affected by PsA, some tissue-specific variants have been identified. Furthermore, current data suggest that the TNF pathway and IL-23/Th17 pathways may be differentially activated in distinct tissue sites. In this review, we briefly describe current knowledge on the pathogenesis of PsA in terms of genetic predisposition, environmental factors and immunology, advancing our hypothesis to explain why a common immunologic process can express itself with significant differences in various tissues.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 15%
Student > Master 9 13%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 19 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 31%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 24 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2018.
All research outputs
#3,966,609
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#567
of 3,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,158
of 330,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#11
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.