| Title |
Stiction and anti-stiction in MEMS and NEMS
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Mechanica Sinica, February 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02487448 |
| Authors |
Zhao Yapu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Montenegro | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 31% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 17% |
| Researcher | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 53 | 56% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 11 | 12% |
| Materials Science | 9 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2017.
All research outputs
#3,272,020
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Acta Mechanica Sinica
#4
of 64 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,447
of 126,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Mechanica Sinica
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them