↓ Skip to main content

Notes on the biology of the Cock-of-the-rock(Rupicola rupicola)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ornithology, July 1971
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Notes on the biology of the Cock-of-the-rock(Rupicola rupicola)
Published in
Journal of Ornithology, July 1971
DOI 10.1007/bf01640691
Authors

D. W. Snow

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 25%
Unknown 6 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 63%
Environmental Science 1 13%
Psychology 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#774
of 1,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#646
of 3,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them