↓ Skip to main content

An update of the Worldwide Integrated Assessment (WIA) on systemic insecticides. Part 3: alternatives to systemic insecticides

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 11,161)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
121 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
Title
An update of the Worldwide Integrated Assessment (WIA) on systemic insecticides. Part 3: alternatives to systemic insecticides
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11356-017-1052-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lorenzo Furlan, Alberto Pozzebon, Carlo Duso, Noa Simon-Delso, Francisco Sánchez-Bayo, Patrice A. Marchand, Filippo Codato, Maarten Bijleveld van Lexmond, Jean-Marc Bonmatin

Abstract

Over-reliance on pesticides for pest control is inflicting serious damage to the environmental services that underpin agricultural productivity. The widespread use of systemic insecticides, neonicotinoids, and the phenylpyrazole fipronil in particular is assessed here in terms of their actual use in pest management, effects on crop yields, and the development of pest resistance to these compounds in many crops after two decades of usage. Resistance can only be overcome in the longterm by implementing methods that are not exclusively based on synthetic pesticides. A diverse range of pest management tactics is already available, all of which can achieve efficient pest control below the economic injury level while maintaining the productivity of the crops. A novel insurance method against crop failure is shown here as an example of alternative methods that can protect farmer's crops and their livelihoods without having to use insecticides. Finally, some concluding remarks about the need for a new framework for a truly sustainable agriculture that relies mainly on natural ecosystem services instead of chemicals are included; this reinforcing the previous WIA conclusions (van der Sluijs et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:148-154, 2015).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 121 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 182 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Student > Master 15 8%
Unspecified 13 7%
Other 12 7%
Other 35 19%
Unknown 48 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 28%
Environmental Science 23 13%
Unspecified 14 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 59 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 243. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2023.
All research outputs
#156,290
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#14
of 11,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,650
of 346,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#1
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,161 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.