| Title |
Stratigraphy and age of the Daohugou Bed in Ningcheng, Inner Mongolia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Bulletin, October 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf03183749 |
| Authors |
Xiaolin Wang, Zhonghe Zhou, Huaiyu He, Fan Jin, Yuanqing Wang, Jiangyong Zhang, Yuan Wang, Xing Xu, Fucheng Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,415,510
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Science Bulletin
#359
of 1,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,813
of 70,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Bulletin
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them